Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Johnson v. Edwards et al
as 8:2012cv00244
Defendant:
Mr. Daniel W. Avelyn, Bartee, Mr. Bryan and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Terry N. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reinke Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Perry et al
as 4:2011cv03193
Defendant:
M&S Irrigation Service, Inc., George S. Perry and Murray M. Winslow
Plaintiff:
Reinke Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lawrey et al v. Good Samaritan Hospital et al
as 8:2011cv00063
Defendant:
Good Samaritan Hospital, Kearney Clinic, P.C. and Dawn M. Murray
Plaintiff:
Dawn Lawrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Lawrey et al v. Good Samaritan Hospital et al
as 8:2011cv00065
Defendant:
Good Samaritan Hospital, Kearney Clinic, P.C. and MD Dawn Murray
Plaintiff:
Aubree Lawrey and Dawn Lawrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
-DLP Davis et al v. Gunter et al
as 4:1988cv00462
Defendant:
Florence Beitler, Harold W. Clarke, Frank O. Gunter and others
Plaintiff:
Stan Davis and Richard Rayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
First National Bank of Omaha v. Murray
as 8:2009mc00090
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Omaha
Defendant:
Irene P. Murray
Murray v Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, et al
as 8:2008cv00408
Plaintiff:
Robert Murray, Robert Murray, Robert Murray and others
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, Doe Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kramer et al v. Cequent Consumer Products, et al
as 4:2008cv03020
Plaintiff:
Robert Kramer and Jayne Kramer
Defendant:
Cequent Consumer Products, Highland Group, Briggs and Stratton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
