Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 470
MOSS v. ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03611
Defendant: MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: PEGGY MOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luciano et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 6:2019cv00891
Not Yet Classified: CVS Health Corporation
Defendant: Aurobindo Pharma LTD, Mylan Inc, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Plaintiff: Amy W. Luciano, Joseph A. Luciano, Joseph A Luciano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC vs. CEPHALON, INC., ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2006cv01797
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SALES CO., INC., BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY, INC., CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and others
Defendant: BARR LABORATORIES, INC., BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CEPHALON, INC. and others
Petitioner: TADEKA PHARMACEUTICAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitr, et al v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 17-7136
In Re: In re: Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee: Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota, a Minnesota Corpoation, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, a Massachusetts Corporation, Federated Mutual Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee: Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: Cambrex Corporation and Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc.
In re: Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitr, et al v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 17-7135
In Re: In re: Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee: Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota, a Minnesota Corpoation, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, a Massachusetts Corporation, Federated Mutual Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant: Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Cambrex Corporation and Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc.
APOTEX, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2006cv02768
Plaintiff: APOTEX, INC.
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC., BARR LABORATORIES, INC., MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Petitioner: BROOKS R. BRUNEAU and ROBERT SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00555
Plaintiff: UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC. , BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PLUMBERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 690 HEALTH PLAN v. ACTAVIS INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00665
Plaintiff: PLUMBERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 690 HEALTH PLAN
Defendant: APOTEX CORP. , DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LTD., FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Modafinil AntiTrust, et al, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3475
Plaintiff - Appellee: J M SMITH CORP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company, MEIJER INC, MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC and others
Defendant - Appellee: CEPHALON INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC and others
Defendant - Appellant: MYLAN LABORATORIES INC, RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Vista Healthplan Inc, et al v. Cephalon Inc, et al
as 15-8085
Plaintiff - Petitioner: VISTA HEALTHPLAN INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Respondent: CEPHALON INC, BARR LABORATORIES INC, MYLAN LABORATORIES INC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?