Cases 11 - 20 of 316
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cohen et al v. STATE FARM FIRE & CAS. INS. CO.
as 2:2023cv01817
Plaintiff:
NEAL COHEN and CAROL COHEN
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Harris v. Marsico, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Edward M. Marsico, Jr., Francis T. Chardo, Richard A. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, PA Dept. of Corrections, Lt. Jankoviak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LABARRE v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC
as 2:2022cv02578
Plaintiff:
NEAL LABARRE
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LABARRE v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC
as 5:2022cv02578
Plaintiff:
NEAL LABARRE
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
