Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Eline v. Espinda
as 2:2020cv00756
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda
Plaintiff:
Richard Eline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Unknown Gomez, D Doane, Unknown Wick and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson v. Alvarez et al
as 4:2019cv00257
Defendant:
B Anderson Flatt, Unknown Salazar, Ayodeji Ladele and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Antwon Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01823
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Matthew Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Balthrop v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03842
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Balthrop and Nolan Balthrop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Withers v. Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company et al
as 2:2017cv03391
Plaintiff:
Michael V Withers
Defendant:
Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company, Corizon LLC, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. Taylor et al
as 2:2017cv02797
Plaintiff:
Kirk Lankford
Defendant:
Joseph Taylor, Benjamin Griego, Jodi Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Averett v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00736
Plaintiff:
Nolan Averett
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nolan v. Trans Union LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nolan and Paulette Nolan
Defendant:
Trans Union LLC, Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC, Experian Information Solutions Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
