Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Norris v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv08047
Plaintiff:
Rodger Norris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mitchell v. Ryan, et al.
as 2:2018cv03165
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Kevin Norris Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Norris v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01374
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ellen Norris
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nickolich et al v. Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center et al
as 2:2017cv00562
Plaintiff:
Dushan Stephan Nickolich, II, Howeard E Valentine, Clarence Brooks and others
Defendant:
Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center, Shanda Payne, Dave Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton v. Chilczuk et al
as 2:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Joseph Norris Clifton
Defendant:
Unknown Chilczuk, A Bock and Maricopa County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clifton v. Ryan
as 2:2016cv04230
Petitioner:
Joseph Norris Clifton
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis #195873 v. Norris
as 2:2016cv03539
Plaintiff:
Philip Davis
Defendant:
Amber Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis #195873 v. Norris
as 2:2016cv03520
Plaintiff:
Philip Davis
Defendant:
Amber Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv08155
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, GEO Group, Unknown Tariq and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Norris Clifton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv01350
Plaintiff:
Ronda J Norris and Gary E Norris
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
