Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Tiger v. Pynkala et al
as 2:2014cv02312
Plaintiff:
Tiger
Defendant:
Jason S. Pynkala, Camron S. Briggs, Christopher Moffatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood et al v. Ameridose, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00913
Plaintiff:
Marjorie H. Norwood and Jerry C. Norwood
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC, Medical Sales Management, Inc., Medical Sales Management SW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norwood v. Lester
as 2:2013cv02582
Petitioner:
Marcus Norwood
Defendant:
Jerry Lester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norwood v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Taylor Ray Norwood
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Norwood v. Travelers
as 2:2012cv02373
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Norwood
Defendant:
Travelers
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Norwood v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2011cv00398
Plaintiff:
Leanora M. Norwood
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Norwood v. Bank of America Corporation
as 1:2009cv00292
Plaintiff:
Linda J Norwood
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Patterson v. Giles County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2008cv00027
Defendant:
Giles County, Tennessee, Kyle Helton, Mike Chandler and others
Plaintiff:
Ruth Patterson and Ruth Patterson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ross et al v. Knox County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
Latisha Ross, Latisha Ross and Dennis Ross
Defendant:
Knox County, Tennessee, Norwood Elementary School, Janie Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norwood v. USA
as 3:2007cv00440
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
