Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Norwood v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00457
Plaintiff:
Robin Norwood
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Swann v. Norwood et al
as 2:2011cv00657
Plaintiff:
Jamil A. Swann
Defendant:
B. Norwood, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. USA
as 5:2011cv80372
Petitioner:
Norwood Wallace Barber, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burrell v. Sams et al
as 2:2011cv00260
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis Burrell
Defendant:
Investigator Sams, Drive-Time-Credit-Corporation, Drive-Time-Car-Sales, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates et al v. Norwood et al
as 3:2011cv00258
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Yates and Richmond May Day Coalition/Organizing Committee
Defendant:
Bryan Norwood , Michael J. Shamus and John Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Norwood v. Paquette et al
as 7:2010cv00517
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Norwood
Defendant:
Alexander Paquette, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and Virginia Distributing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Burnley v. Norwood et al
as 3:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
John Rodgers Burnley
Defendant:
Bryan T. Norwood, John Venuti, Howard J. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craft et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
James Lee Craft, James Lee Craft, Matthew Ray and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Norman Sales, Rodney D. Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Jones v. Delosch et al
as 3:2009cv00128
Plaintiff:
Geniva F. Jones
Defendant:
Paul Delosch, Kenneth L. Mittendorff, Sharon Ducan and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
