Cases 11 - 20 of 22
McDonald v. Abizaid et al
as 1:2017cv00907
Defendant:
Thomas S. Gross, Bruce A. Carbonari, RPM International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodgers v. Nance et al
as 1:2016cv01134
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Rodgers
Defendant:
Craig Nance, Hamilton County Sheriff and Hamilton County, Ohio/Board Of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Nance v. Zwicker & Associates, PC et al
as 1:2013cv01604
Plaintiff:
Constance D. Nance
Defendant:
Zwicker & Associates, PC , Derek Scranton and Anne Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nance et al v. Claypool Electric, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00675
Plaintiff:
Todd Nance and Chad Bean
Defendant:
Claypool Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carter v. Twin Valley Behavior et al
as 2:2012cv00795
Plaintiff:
Cardional Anna Vines Carter
Defendant:
Twin Valley Behavior, RN-Frank-Unit (7), Susan Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bennett v. Nance
as 1:2011cv00773
Plaintiff:
Elisabeth Bennett
Defendant:
Craig E Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nance v. Smith
as 1:2009cv01536
Petitioner:
Kevin Nance
Respondent:
Keith Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nance v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17870
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Nance and Betty Irene Nance
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Company, Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Nance et al
as 1:2007cv01931
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Sandra Nance, Robert L. Nance and KeyBank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
