Cases 11 - 16 of 16
United States of America v. Sejour et al (Pierre)
as 12-2503
Appellant:
Enouse Pierre
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marcel Lionel Sejour, Gene Seymour, Dwayne Walker and others
NATHANIAL HAYNES v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 1:2011cv05927
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Citibank NA, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Haynes and Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6
In Re: Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2011md02262
Plaintiff:
303 Proprietary Trading LLC, 303030 Trading LLC, 33-35 Green Pond Road Associates, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Linda Zacher
Defendant:
All Defendants, BBA Enterprises, Ltd., BBA Libor, Ltd and others
Consolidated Defendant:
RBS Citizens, NA
Interested Party:
ICAP Europe Ltd. and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Petitioner:
Brian McCormick, Vito Spillone and Maxwell Van De Velde
Not Classified By Court:
Tullett Liberty Brokerage Inc., Tullett Prebon Financial Services LLC, Tradition America LLC and others
Receiver:
FDIC, as receiver
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
County of Mendocino, ICAP, City of Houston and others
Respondent:
BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Haynes v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00372
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Haynes and Nathaniel Haynes
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation, Bears Stearns and Quality Loan Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Haynes v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00372
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Haynes and Nathaniel Haynes
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation, Bears Stearns and Quality Loan Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Haynes v. Rapelje
as 5:2009cv12123
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Haynes
Respondent:
Lloyd Rapelje
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
