Cases 11 - 20 of 21
POTTER et al v. NEWKIRK et al
as 1:2017cv08478
Plaintiff:
KEVIN POTTER and MARGUERITE POTTER
Defendant:
DAVID NEWKIRK, ROBERT ROBBINS, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEAGIN v. ROMNEY et al
as 2:2017cv02765
Plaintiff:
EVETTE C. FEAGIN
Defendant:
MITT ROMNEY, DOROTHEA WERTZ and MUOBO NEWKIRK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWKIRK v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07944
Plaintiff:
MARIE A. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEAGIN v. CRUMP et al
as 2:2016cv01171
Plaintiff:
EVETTE C. FEAGIN
Defendant:
MILDRED CRUMP and MUOBO NEWKIRK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
POPIOLEK v. TOWNSHIP OF DEPTFORD et al
as 1:2015cv03291
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY POPIOLEK
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF DEPTFORD , SANDRA REID , TODD GRAVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BARCUS et al V. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2012cv06380
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. BARCUS, LAWRENCE BOSS, ROBIN NEWKIRK and others
Defendant:
STEVE JOHNSON, MERRIL MAIN, MAIOR ROBERTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT et al
as 2:2009cv05336
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER, EDWARD SALERNO, DOUGLAS MINATEE and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, DR. MERRIL MAIN, CLERKE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
