Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Garcia et al v. Beyond Meat, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Richard Garcia, Erica Nichols Cook, Jennifer Speer and others
Defendant:
Beyond Meat, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Nicholl-Embree v. George et al
as 4:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Stephen Robert Nicholl-Embree and Stephen Robert Stark
Defendant:
James George, Beth Skinner, Warden and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsay v. Schwartz, et al
as 4:2021cv00245
Petitioner:
Michael Miles Lindsay
Respondent:
Ann Schwartz, Stacy Good, Cathy Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00042
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lisa Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stacy v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2021cv00127
Defendant:
Randy Gibb, Trip, Lisa Nance and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Stacy
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2021cv00125
Defendant:
Randy Gibb, Trip, Lisa Nance and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hamby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koehn v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
Zachary Koehn
Defendant:
Randy Gibb, Trip, Brad Hoenig and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00270
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Donald Lee Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nichols v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00069
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Donald Lee Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stringer v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv00168
Defendant:
Julie Ann Jones, Jessica Ann O'Brien, Kimberly Sue Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Marcy Ann Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
