Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Snowden et al v. Prince George's County Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Snowden , David Francis , Kevin Stewart and others
Defendant:
Prince George's County Department of Corrections, Mary Lou McDonough, Colonel Mark E Person and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Haskins v. Bietzel
as 1:2016cv00599
Plaintiff:
Ronald Haskins
Defendant:
Chaplain Bietzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mich v. Nice et al
as 1:2014cv01397
Plaintiff:
Aurel Mich
Defendant:
J. Nice, Chaplain Wilson and Lamp North
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lagana v. Shearin et al
as 8:2014cv00970
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lagana
Defendant:
Bobby Shearin, Collin Ohey, Ava Joubeit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neff v. Steven et al
as 1:2014cv00718
Plaintiff:
Frank Michael Neff
Defendant:
Sgt Steven, Chaplain Hancock, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal-El v. Beitzel et al
as 8:2013cv01838
Plaintiff:
Craig Neal-El
Defendant:
Chaplain D. Beitzel, Frank Bishop and Gary D. Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Maryland Division of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv03303
Plaintiff:
Eric White
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Correction, Warden Bobby Shearin and Chaplain Lamp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Maryland Division of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv03302
Plaintiff:
Gregory Reid
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Correction, Warden Bobby Shearin and Chaplain Lamp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordan v. Maryland Division of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv03304
Plaintiff:
Liley Gordan
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Correction, Warden Bobby Shearin and Chaplain Lamp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Maryland Division of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv03301
Plaintiff:
Corey Lamonde James
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Correction, Warden Bobby Shearin and Chaplain Lamp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
