Cases 11 - 20 of 265
Odum v. Santerre et al
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bernard Odum
Defendant:
Matthew Santerre, Steven Ceballos and Steven Olivas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Odum v. Santerre
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Odum
Defendant:
Matthew Santerre, Steven Olivas, Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Odum
as 1:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Odum
as 5:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. ODUM
as 5:2023cv00482
Petitioner:
ANTONIO JONES
Respondent:
WARDEN ROY ODUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Odum
as 2:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
Randal Lee Brooks
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Electric Boat Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Odum Reed
Defendant:
Electric Boat Corporation and Riley Power Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ODUM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15028
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ODUM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hart v. Judd et al
as 8:2023cv02133
Plaintiff:
Randy Hart and Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Grady Judd, FNU Fain, FNU Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STYLES v. ODUM
as 7:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
DERRICK STYLES
Respondent:
WARDEN ROY ODUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
