Cases 11 - 20 of 657
Shrader v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority Haysi Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Shrader
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority Haysi Jail, Dr. Crystal Large, Officer M. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Dotson
as 3:2023cv00800
Petitioner:
Keith Owens
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Virginia State University et al
as 3:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Bridgett P. Robertson
Defendant:
Virginia State University, Makola M. Abdullah, Ph.D., Tia A. Minnis, Ph.D and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Owens v. Virginia Parole Board
as 3:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Owens
Defendant:
Virginia Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Guaranteed Rate Mortgage, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Richard Henry Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Guaranteed Rate Mortgage, N.A., ServiceMac, LLC and Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 Violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Bonds v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Durwin Evant Bonds, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Rick White, K. Almarade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv01173
Plaintiff:
Michael Owens
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Artrip et al
as 7:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
Stephen S. Owens
Defendant:
Berk Artrip, Dentin Hite, Edward Boakye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen v. Railey
as 1:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F. Owen
Defendant:
Railey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Owens v. Artrip et al
as 1:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Stephen S. Owens
Defendant:
Berk Artrip, Dentin Hite, Edward Boakye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
