Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Johnson v. AK. Department of Correctional et al.
as 3:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
Alvin Roy Johnson
Defendant:
AK. Department of Correctional, Palmer Correctional Centers and Personal Property Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archey v. Palmer Correctional Center
as 3:2015cv00213
Petitioner:
Garry R. Archey
Respondent:
Palmer Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. 600 N. Golden Hills Drive, Palmer, Alaska
as 3:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
600 N. Golden Hills Drive, Palmer, Alaska
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Thomas v. District Attorneys Office Palmer AK. et al
as 3:2012cv00151
Plaintiff:
Andrew Victor Thomas
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office Palmer AK., Richard Allen, Trina Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. State of Alaska District Attorneys Office Palmer AK et al
as 3:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Andrew Victor Thomas
Defendant:
State of Alaska District Attorney's Office, Palmer, AK, Richard Allen, Trina Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. National Note of Utah, LC et al
as 3:2012mc00026
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
National Note of Utah, LC and LaMar Palmer
Cohen Ex Rel v. City of Palmer, Alaska
as 3:2011cv00199
Plaintiff:
Arlene Cohen
Defendant:
City of Palmer, Alaska
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Palmer et al v. United States of America
as 4:2008cv00047
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Palmer and Mary Ann Larsen Palmer
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Briggs v. City of Palmer
as 3:2008cv00177
Plaintiff:
Ray T. Briggs
Defendant:
City of Palmer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grove v. State of Alaska et al
as 3:2007cv00179
Petitioner:
Richard M. Grove
Defendant:
State of Alaska and Palmer Public Defenders Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
