Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Selden v. Sleet et al
as 2:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
Glenn Lee Selden
Defendant:
Daniel A Sleet, Julie L. Jones, Pamela Bondi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADDLEMAN v. BONDI
as 4:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
LINCOLN LANE ADDLEMAN, JR
Defendant:
PAMELA BONDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Biton v. Verrilli
as 17-2797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Danielle Biton and Crystal Biton
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Beaton Verrilli, Eric T. Schneiderman, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and others
Biton v. Verrilli
as 17-2791
Plaintiff:
Ms. Crystal Biton, AKA Saphyre M. Redford
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ms. Danielle Biton, AKA Daniel Bitton
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Beaton Verrilli, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of New York, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and others
Biton v. Verrilli
as 17-2789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ms. Crystal Biton, AKA Saphyre M. Redford and Ms. Danielle Biton, AKA Daniel Bitton
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Beaton Verrilli, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of New York, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and others
Lawn v. Jones et al
as 2:2017cv14249
Plaintiff:
Charles James Lawn , Jr.
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Pamela Bondi, Schuthiess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 2:2017cv14188
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Alexander Smith, D. York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv21798
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Wexford Health Services, Centurion Health Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASEY v. BONDI et al
as 4:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M CASEY
Defendant:
PAMELA BONDI, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Jones et al
as 3:2017cv00265
Petitioner:
Michael D. Adams
Respondent:
Julie Jones and Pamela Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
