Cases 11 - 20 of 11,833
Rose v. Northern Division of Parole
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Rose
Defendant:
Northern Division of Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chino v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Earl Chino
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lujan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lynn Manning
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Dominic Sanchez
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valencia v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Raul Angel Valencia
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
KAREEM-LATEEF ALEXANDER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS and PA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kindred v. Texas Parole Board et al
as 6:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Kindred
Defendant:
Texas Parole Board, Temple, Texas Parole Office, Field Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armour v. TX Board of Pardons
as 24-40347
Plaintiff:
Artis Armour
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, David Gutierriez, Paul Keil and others
ONDISH v. SUPER INTENDENT HAINESWORTH et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. ONDISH, SR.
Respondent:
SUPER INTENDENT HAINESWORTH and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
