Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Johnson v. Rosalez et al
as 4:2022cv04091
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
R. Rosalez, Sergeant A. Cuevas, S. Stribling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 22-15050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH CHUDY, M.D., THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D. and others
Paul Johnson v. Ron Davis, et al
as 21-17050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RON DAVIS, T. ALLEN, R. BROOMFIELD and others
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
SHERVONTAY ROUNDTREE v. SCOTT TUMMOND et al
as 1:2021cv00069
Defendant:
BRETT BOYCE, LEVY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ZACKARY HINKOFER and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL JONES and SHERVONTAY ROUNDTREE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Johnson v. Cuevas et al
as 5:2021cv05264
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
A. Cuevas, Ron Davis, T. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 21-16110
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director of CDCR, A. TRAQUINA, M.D., CMO, NORMA ACQUVA, M.D., HCM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Paul Johnson v. D. Runnels, et al
as 21-15888
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. P. CHEN, MD at CSP-SOL, BINOYE NAKU, L. B. BROWN, Jr., MD at CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Paul Johnson v. A. Agpoon, et al
as 21-15606
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT VERDIER, A. AGPOON and R. BROOMFIELD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
