Cases 11 - 20 of 104
PENA v. OLDCASTLE APG NORTHEAST, INC.
as 2:2023cv02274
Plaintiff:
ANGEL PENA
Defendant:
OLDCASTLE APG, INC., OLDCASTLE APG, INC. doing business as ANCHOR A CRH COMPANY and OLDCASTLE APG NORTHEAST, INC. doing business as ANCHOR A CRH COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Pena-Reyes v. USA
as 1:2023cv00451
Petitioner:
Axel Pena-Reyes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pena v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv00300
Petitioner:
Jose C. Pena
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01559
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Gillespie v. Akal Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01329
Plaintiff:
James Gillespie
Defendant:
Akal Express, Inc. and Carlos Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PENA et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01968
Plaintiff:
MYSTI PENA and HECTOR PENA
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
