Cases 11 - 20 of 665
Williams v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv03831
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stephen Williams
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Terrell Backes, Cheri Grott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03528
Plaintiff:
Margaret Peters
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Peters v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03413
Plaintiff:
Richard Peters
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Jenkins v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Betty Lee Jenkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McIntosh v. Peters et al
as 0:2023cv03150
Plaintiff:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Defendant:
Collette S Peters, Central Office Religious Director for the Federal Bureau of Prisons and Central Office Director of Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jama v. Peters et al
as 0:2023cv03075
Plaintiff:
Muna Jama
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian, Warden Michael Segal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jokhoo v. Wohlman et al
as 0:2023cv03022
Petitioner:
Khemall Jokhoo
Respondent:
Ned G. Wohlman, Kendall James, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stamps v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv03014
Plaintiff:
Alessandra Katie Stamps
Defendant:
United States of America, Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friday v. Peters et al
as 0:2023cv02870
Plaintiff:
Cleone Cecelia Friday
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian, Michael Segal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
