Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Tiedeman v. Weber et al
as 4:2013cv04126
Plaintiff:
Jesse C. Tiedeman
Defendant:
Douglas L. Weber, Troy Ponto, Clifton Fantroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. M & J Distributing, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv04121
Plaintiff:
Chris Peterson
Defendant:
M & J Distributing, Inc. and Matt Stiener
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Boyter v. Pennington Co Sheriff Dept.
as 5:2013cv05072
Plaintiff:
James Boyter
Defendant:
Pennington Co Sheriff Dept., Keven Thom, James Rown Horst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reints v. City of Rapid City, South Dakota et al
as 5:2013cv05043
Plaintiff:
John Reints
Defendant:
City of Rapid City, South Dakota, Travelers Insurance Companies, Inc., Jason Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv04039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Discrimination Against the Disabled
Peterson v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv04189
Movant:
Azizia Peterson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Peterson v. RVS Line, L.L.C.
as 4:2012cv04185
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Peterson
Defendant:
RVS Line, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dalrymple et al v. Dooley et al
as 4:2012cv04098
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Dalrymple and Leslie W. White, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Jennifer Stanwick, Sue Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Peterson et al
as 4:2012cv04078
Plaintiff:
Clayton Walker
Defendant:
Shawn Peterson and Brian Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferies/One-Feather Bell v. Sammarone et al
as 3:2011cv03030
Plaintiff:
Thomas Phillip Jefferies/One-Feather Bell
Defendant:
Charles Sammarone, Jeff Kashchak, Kyle Ratliff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
