Cases 11 - 20 of 1,628
Phillips v. Department of Children and Family Services et al
as 1:2024cv02119
Plaintiff:
Lametra Phillips
Defendant:
Department of Children and Family Services and Christina Nickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Phillips v. Cross et al
as 1:2024cv02102
Plaintiff:
Dezzan Phillips
Defendant:
Maurice Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Strack et al
as 1:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
Dezzan D. Phillips
Defendant:
Daina Strack, Ben Slocum, Jason Edgecomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Gooden et al
as 4:2024cv04048
Plaintiff:
LaQuadia Edwards
Defendant:
Antoinette Gooden and Kirk Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Holland
as 1:2024cv01952
Plaintiff:
Dezzan D. Phillips
Defendant:
Scott T. Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Navarro et al
as 1:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Dezzan Denzell Phillips
Defendant:
Joseph R Navarro, Nicholas Navarroli, Cynitha M Raccuglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Edgcomb et al
as 1:2024cv01890
Petitioner:
Dezzan D Phillips
Respondent:
LaSalle County Jail and Jason Edgcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harwick v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
David Harwick
Defendant:
Sharonda Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kreke et al v. James et al
as 3:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Allen Kreke and Marathon-Sparta Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Bryan Perry James, John Bracken Bryan, John Shelby Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
