Cases 11 - 20 of 209
Reich v. Stanley et al
as 5:2023ct03241
Plaintiff:
Scott Randall Reich
Defendant:
Superintendent Stanley, Talena H. Lee, Mr. Vorhees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. CommScope, Inc. of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Randall S. Huffman and Randall Huffman
Defendant:
CommScope, Inc. of North Carolina and CommScope Holding Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Clouse v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Randall Clouse
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Chandler v. Politi et al
as 5:2023ct03206
Plaintiff:
Randall Chandler
Defendant:
Dr. Politi, Wellpath, LLC, Captain M. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
Randall Willis and Nancy Willis
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Bolin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Courtney Randall Bolin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WALL v. USA
as 1:2023cv00400
Petitioner:
JARBARRI RANDALE WALL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Global Dimensions, LLC v. Tackett
as 5:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Global Dimensions, LLC
Defendant:
Randall Tackett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Randall v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
William D. Randall
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02052
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
