Cases 11 - 20 of 21
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Reilly
as 2:2014cv00353
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
John B. Reilly
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kahl v. Eloqua, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
Bradley Christopher Kahl
Defendant:
Eloqua, Inc., Joseph P. Payne, Neal Dempsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Carlyle Club, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01007
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Abkco Music, Inc. , Rondor Music International, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Carlyle Club, LLC and Brennan R. Reilly
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Elliott et al v. Reilly et al
as 1:2011cv00958
Plaintiff:
James Elliott and SiRRAN Communications Inc.
Defendant:
Brendan Reilly , SiRRAN Communications USA Inc., SiRRAN Communications LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew v. Blank et al
as 3:2010cv00353
Plaintiff:
Colin Andrew
Defendant:
Jonathan Blank, Tom Haymore, Lynn Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pitney Bowes Inc. v. Reilly
as 1:2009cv00898
Plaintiff:
Pitney Bowes Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Reilly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Root v. County of Fairfax et al
as 1:2008cv00498
Plaintiff:
Louise Root
Defendant:
County of Fairfax, Michelle McCall, Pameal Schmoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Proffitt v. Cipolla et al
as 3:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Eugene Proffitt
Defendant:
Richard Cipolla, Edward F. Reilly, Jr. and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
