Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Harleysville Preferred Insurance Company v. McGuffin et al
as 8:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
Harleysville Preferred Insurance Company
Defendant:
Charles McGuffin, Gloria McGuffin, Chris McGuffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Norman v. Greenville County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2017cv00364
Plaintiff:
Rahmad I Norman
Defendant:
Greenville County Sheriff's Office, A J Waterlander, J T Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Simpsonville, City of et al
as 6:2015cv01714
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Simpsonville, City of, Jason Weibel, Justin Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Smeltzer et al
as 6:2013cv01613
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Robert Smeltzer, Richard Roe, Jane Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Norman v. Osbourne et al
as 8:2013cv01242
Plaintiff:
Rahmad I Norman
Defendant:
Steave Osbourne , Officer Nichols , Nick Futch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Graham v. Murray et al
as 8:2012cv03561
Plaintiff:
Onjela Mildred Graham
Defendant:
John Long, John Doe, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forbes v. Dawsey et al
as 4:2012cv00862
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Forbes
Defendant:
Martin C Dawsey, Bellamy Law Firm, The, R Michael Munden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. McCray et al
as 4:2011cv01305
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sam J McCray, Gilbert McCray, Elsie Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Lemon v. Doe et al
as 3:2010cv02758
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Lemon, Sr
Defendant:
John Doe, Richard Roe, City of Sumter Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Cannon
as 2:2010cv02236
Plaintiff:
Terrence Bowie Robinson
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
