Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Kitchen v. PA Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2016cv02129
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Kitchen, Sr.
Defendant:
PA Board of Probation and Parole, Jeffrey Ruzicki and Douglas Schaeffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00818
Petitioner:
ROBERT ALLEN SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SEELIG v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2014cv06901
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN SEELIG
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KAMLER et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2014cv06135
Plaintiff:
LARRY KAMLER and ROBERT ALLEN SEELIG
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHENRY et al v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 2:2014cv00667
Plaintiff:
DOYLE WHENRY , JENIFER ALFREDO , CHARITY ANTUS and others
Defendant:
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF MERCER, BRIAN BEADER, JOHN LECHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SMITH v. USA
as 2:2011cv01569
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ROBERT ALLEN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BUTLER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65424
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN BUTLER and MARIA BUTLER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOODMAN v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61206
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN GOODMAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC. , GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06288
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN, JR. , ESSIE ASHFORD , SOONJ BARTHOLET and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BETTELLI v. SMEAL et al
as 1:2010cv00005
Petitioner:
ROBERT ALLEN BETTELLI
Respondent:
PAUL K. SMEAL, THOMAS CORBETT and PAMELA LOGSDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
