Cases 11 - 20 of 87
MARTIN v. MCCLESTER et al
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
CUBA ALASKA MARTIN, III
Defendant:
COI CODY MCCLESTER, Deputy Warden DEXTER MOSES, Warden SCOTT WIZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Alicia Rutledge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KEE v. RUTLEDGE et al
as 1:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
DALLAS KEE
Defendant:
AMY LYNNE RUTLEDGE, WILEY SANDERS TRUCK LINES INC, HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hooks v. Henkle et al
as 1:2022cv01995
Plaintiff:
Lacresa Hooks
Defendant:
Andrew Henkle, Sheriff Eric J. Levett, Investigator Stephen J. Rutledge and others
HARVEY v. BLACK et al
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL HARVEY
Defendant:
Warden REGAN BLACK, BERNICE HUDSON, GEORGIA CORRECTIONS FOOD SERVICE INDUSTRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Shafer et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Defendant:
Peter B. Rutledge, David Shafer, Yang Yuanqing and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES v. WILLAMSON et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADDARRYL JONES and TUPAC DAVID SHAKUR
Defendant:
TERRANCE DENNIS, KELSIE WILLIAMSON, WARDEN BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUTLEDGE v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RAY RUTLEDGE
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUTLEDGE v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2021cv00393
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RAY RUTLEDGE
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Unknown District Attorney et al
as 3:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Latego Anquan Rutledge
Defendant:
Unknown District Attorney, Unknown GST, Unknown Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
