Cases 11 - 20 of 20
U.S. Bank National Association v. Garcia et al
as 5:2012cv00484
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Rafael Garcia and Maria Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
U.S. Bank National Association v. Garcia et al
as 5:2011cv06624
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Rafael Garcia and Maria Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Garcia et al v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2011cv03317
Plaintiff:
Juan Rafael Garcia , Maria Garcia , Nataly Garcia and others
Defendant:
County of Sacramento and Jeffrey Morace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia et al v. Morace et al
as 2:2011at01799
Plaintiff:
Juan Rafael Garcia, Maria Garcia, Nataly Garcia and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Morace and County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al
as 2:2011at01800
Plaintiff:
Juan Rafael Garcia , Maria Garcia , Nataly Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2011at01801
Plaintiff:
Juan Rafael Garcia , Maria Garcia , Nataly Garcia and others
Defendant:
County of Sacramento and Jeffrey Morace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Garcia-Robledo v. USA
as 1:2009cv01165
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rafael Garcia-Robledo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Flores v. Tilton
as 3:2008cv01086
Petitioner:
Rafael Garcia Flores
Respondent:
Tilton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AMPAC MORRIS PARTNERSHIP DBA BEAMO et al v. Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 8:2007cv01148
Plaintiff:
AMPAC MORRIS PARTNERSHIP DBA BEAMO and RAFAEL GARCIA
Defendant:
Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
