Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hugler v. Ramirez Plastering, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Defendant:
Ismael Ramirez and Ramirez Plastering, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez-Campos v. USA
as 8:2016cv00309
Petitioner:
Luis Fabian Ramirez-Campos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez v. USA
as 4:2016cv03103
Petitioner:
Leonardo F. Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nickman v. Zarraga et al
as 8:2016cv00262
Defendant:
Scott B. Andreala, Todd Bahensky, Jaime Lyn Craft and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Nickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 8:2015cv00052
Petitioner:
Ahmad Z. Adili, Erick Boch, Clive Cohen and others
Respondent:
Mr president of the United States Barack Obama and Six Unknown Names Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wells Fargo Bank v. Ramirez et al
as 8:2013mc00081
Debtor:
Silvia Maria Birhanzel
Defendant:
Antonio Ramirez
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank
Ramirez v. USA
as 8:2013cv00066
Petitioner:
Victor Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez v. Scotts Bluff County et al
as 7:2012cv05008
Defendant:
City of Scottsbluff, Philip Eckerberg, Philip Mosher and others
Plaintiff:
Mario F Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Melgoza Ramirez v. Britten
as 8:2012cv00074
Respondent:
Fred Britten
Petitioner:
Juan A. Melgoza Ramirez
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
