Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
JOHNSON v. O'NEIL et al
as 1:2013cv00564
Plaintiff: KEVIN RAPHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant: JAMES O'NEIL and BENJAMIN WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. USA
as 1:2012cv00975
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: RAPHAEL TOMAR CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rogers et al v. Herring et al
as 5:2011ct03189
Plaintiff: Raphael Maurice Rogers, Gloria Doughty, James Locust and others
Defendant: J. Mark Herring, Paul L. Jones, Christopher Rogerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAIN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2010cv00866
Plaintiff: BRENDA CAIN , AUSTIN RODDEN , BROOKE TOMPKINS and others
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Astrue
as 7:2010cv00224
Plaintiff: Charles Raphael Roberts
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mendez v. Britt
as 5:2010ct03081
Plaintiff: Raphael Mendez
Defendant: W. Earl Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chubirko v. Better Business Bureau of Southern Piedmont, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00502
Plaintiff: John Chubirko
Defendant: Better Business Bureau of Southern Piedmont, Inc, Sue Breckenridge, Rick Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Mendez v. Britt et al
as 5:2008ct03135
Plaintiff: Raphael Mendez
Defendant: W. Earl Britt, James B. Craven, III, Alan Dubois and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mendez v. Craven
as 5:2007hc02173
Petitioner: Raphael Mendez
Respondent: James B. Craven, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Totou We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00391
Defendant: Kodjovi Raphael Totou
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?