Cases 11 - 20 of 21
COLEY v. WATKINS et al
as 1:2017cv00354
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMAS COLEY
Defendant:
K. WATKINS, J. RAWLINGS, HIGH POINT POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF EARL SIBBETT, JR., BY AND THROUGH JO PALMER SIBBETT, EXECUTOR et al v. THE RAWLINGS COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF EARL SIBBETT, JR. , NORTH CAROLINA COUNTIES LIABILITY AND PROPERTY JOINT RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY and RANDOLPH COUNTY
Defendant:
THE RAWLINGS COMPANY, LLC and BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Everette et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015cv00653
Plaintiff:
Dallas Gray Everette , Dora Barksdale Everette, Katherine Williams and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Robert A. McDonald, Cheryl Rawls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rawls v. Hollembaek
as 5:2015hc02162
Petitioner:
Gregory L. Rawls
Respondent:
Stephanie Hollembaek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rawlings v. USA
as 5:2015cv00359
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bobby Lee Rawlings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Richard Laverne Brown , Jacqueline G. Hill , Delphine Murray Williams and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coles v. Rawls et al
as 5:2013ct03053
Plaintiff:
O'Neal A. Coles
Defendant:
Nurse Rawls and Piedmont Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rawlings v. USA
as 5:2011cv00338
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bobby Lee Rawlings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LONGMAN v. RAWLINGS FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
GEORGIANNA LONGMAN
Defendant:
RAWLINGS FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rawlings v. USA
as 5:2009cv00047
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bobby Lee Rawlings
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
