Cases 11 - 20 of 721
Hernandez et al v. Burgess
as 1:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Jose Lemus Hernandez, Karla Lopez De Lemus and K.L.L
Defendant:
Joseph Reed Burgess, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
REED v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
JOHN REED, JR.
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reed v. Garza et al
as 1:2023cv01471
Petitioner:
Robert Reed
Respondent:
F. Garza and Lynn Leibovitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reed v. Cushwa et al
as 1:2023cv01445
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Reed
Respondent:
Patricia K. Cushwa and Christopher Whitmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tunsil v. Laurel et al
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Barrett S. Tunsil
Defendant:
Harry Laurel, WellPath, Inc, Pennsylvania Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbin v. Bucks County et al
as 2:2023cv02784
Plaintiff:
Valeria Corbin
Defendant:
Bucks County, David Kratz, James Coyne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REED v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv02204
Plaintiff:
BRANDE REED
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
ADAMS v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SUPERINTENDENT METELLUS, KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
