Cases 11 - 20 of 21
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. Richland, City of
as 2:2013cv05085
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
Richland, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. Richland, City of
as WAE/2:13-cv-05085
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
Richland, City of
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. West Richland, City of
as 2:2013cv05082
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
West Richland, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Default
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. West Richland, City of
as WAE/2:13-cv-05082
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
West Richland, City of
WELLS v. LUMPKIN, CITY OF et al
as 4:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
JANICE WELLS
Defendant:
LUMPKIN, CITY OF , RICHLAND, CITY OF , RYAN FLEMEN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
10 North Washington Avenue LLC v. Richland, City of
as 2:2011cv05041
Plaintiff:
10 North Washington Avenue LLC
Defendant:
Richland, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gustafson v. West Richland, City of et al
as 2:2010cv05058
Plaintiff:
David Carl Gustafson
Defendant:
West Richland, City of , Travis Scheibe , Lance Erdman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gustafson v. West Richland, City of
as 2:2010cv05040
Plaintiff:
David C Gustafson
Defendant:
West Richland, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lenk v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 2:2010cv05018
Plaintiff:
Roger Lenk
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America, Cigna Group Insurance and Richland, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
