Cases 11 - 20 of 111
Wilson v. Pamunkey Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Brian Wilson
Defendant:
Lieutenant Hackett, Officer Rivera, Shridhar Bhat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Builders Mutual Insurance Company v. Rivera's Construction, LLC
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Builders Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rivera's Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Dickson v. Rivera et al
as 1:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
Simone Dickson
Defendant:
Richard Rivera, Bridget Morrelli and Alhagle B. Secka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Riviera v. City Of Chesapeake
as 2:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
Joiecel A. Rivera
Defendant:
City Of Chesapeake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Rivera v. USA
as 4:2022cv00105
Petitioner:
Jaime Rivera
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Nierva v. Rivera et al
as 6:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Lucky Caesar Nierva
Defendant:
Teguez Michael Rivera and Rivera Carrier, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rivera v. Sturgill et al
as 7:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
M.D. Sturgill, T. Dowell, M. Vaughan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, David Robinson, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Coley et al
as 7:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
Coley, C. Weaver, K.P. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
