Cases 11 - 20 of 64
NYHUS v. VIRIDIAN MOTOR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05254
Plaintiff:
DALE NYHUS
Defendant:
VIRIDIAN MOTOR CORPORATION, TERRY W. LANGHORNE and ROBERT K. LANGHORNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICKER et al v. ENVIROSERVE JV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
as 2:2013cv00819
Plaintiff:
AMANDA RICKER and DANIEL RICKER
Defendant:
ENVIROSERVE JV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and ROBERT K. NYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
DAVIS v. SEARS et al
as 2:2012cv04657
Petitioner:
ROBERT K. DAVIS
Respondent:
RANDALL N. SEARS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
ROBERT K. FOSTER INC. v. DHLP LIMERICK GOLF COMMUNITY, LP et al
as 2:2011cv07646
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. FOSTER INC.
Defendant:
DHLP LIMERICK GOLF COMMUNITY, LP, DHLP KING'S GRANT, L.P., DHLP SHADELAND WOODS, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50978
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. THOMPSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SPANGLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 5:2011cv53582
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. SPANGLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DROULARD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51954
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DROULARD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEE v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
DION PATRICK LEE, III
Defendant:
RONALD J. BRYANT, WILLIAM J. WOODS, ROBERT K. SUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv35136
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. HARRIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
