Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
CARUTHERS v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00342
Defendant: R. BROWN, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, DANIEL DONAHUE and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT O. CARUTHERS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bochner v. Lemmon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01604
Plaintiff: John A Bochner
Defendant: Bruce Lemmon, Mark Sevier, Daryl Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOCHNER v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2014cv00693
Plaintiff: JOHN A. BOCHNER
Defendant: BRUCE LEMMON, ROBERT O. MOORE, KEVIN MULROONY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROLL v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01664
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff: ROBERT O. ROLL
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Haury v. Moore et al
as 3:2013cv00557
Plaintiff: Michael Hunter Haury
Defendant: Robert O Moore and Clair Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARUTHERS v. SUPERINTENDENT, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 4:2012cv00090
Plaintiff: ROBERT O. CARUTHERS, JR.
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and SUPERINTENDENT, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARUTHERS v. UNKNOWN OFFICERS
as 4:2012cv00048
Plaintiff: ROBERT O. CARUTHERS, JR.
Defendant: UNKNOWN OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01632
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv00309
Petitioner: ROBERT O. WILLIAMS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?