Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Patterson v. Hall et al
as 3:2013cv00338
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Johnson Patterson
Defendant:
Jacinta Hall, Gian C. Barnett, Michelle Purvis Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00339
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Johnson Patterson
Defendant:
Michele Purvis Harris, Greta M. Harris, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Smith et al
as 3:2012cv00815
Petitioner:
Rodrick Johnson Patterson
Respondent:
Robert Smith, Jeff Weills, Jr., STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Weill et al
as 3:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Patterson Johnson
Defendant:
Jeff Weill, Sr., Jim Hood, Karla Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jourdan River Estates, LLC et al v. Hancock County et al
as 1:2012cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jourdan River Estates, LLC and Jourdan River Resort and Yacht Club, LLC
Defendant:
Hancock County, Hancock County Board of Supervisors, Lisa Cowand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00568
Plaintiff:
Sasha Booth , All Plaintiffs , Travis Booth and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLC
as 3:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Antoino M. Adams, All Plaintiffs, James C. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Blakely v. Pilgrim International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Carl Blakely, Sr., Clevin McDonald, Doris Peppers and others
Defendant:
Pilgrim International, Inc., Thor Industries, Inc., Monaco Coach Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
