Cases 11 - 20 of 268
Rodriguez v. Divris
as 4:2023cv40107
Petitioner:
Eduardo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Superintendent Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kostka v. Rodriguez
as 1:2023cv11428
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kostka
Respondent:
Michael Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez et al v. Home Depot U.S.A. , Inc.
as 1:2023cv11343
Plaintiff:
Miosotis Mena Rodriguez and Martin Rodriguez
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. doing business as Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Rodriguez v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11166
Plaintiff:
Theresa Rodriguez
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ly v. Luxury Logistics, LLC. et al
as 3:2023cv30043
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Ly
Defendant:
Luxury Logistics, LLC., David Rodriguez, Eddie Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Divris
as 1:2023cv10329
Petitioner:
Eduardo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Divris
as 4:2023cv10329
Petitioner:
Eduardo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2023cv40010
Plaintiff:
Marilene Rodriguez, Steven M. Sargent, David Doherty and others
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Jason Gaumon, Alex Maracallo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Burdzy et al
as 1:2022cv12207
Plaintiff:
Elijah J Rodriguez
Defendant:
Mark Burdzy, Kevin S Clonan, J Peppoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
