Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 11 - 20 of 428
Bowens v. Rogers County Sheriffs Office We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv01054
Plaintiff: Don Bowens
Defendant: Rogers County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yargee v. Rogers
as 4:2023cv00501
Petitioner: David Yargee
Respondent: David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kolosha v. Rogers
as 4:2023cv00481
Petitioner: Vitaly Kolosha
Respondent: David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Truitt v. Campbell et al
as 5:2023cv01004
Plaintiff: Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant: Susanne Campbell, Dr Jeanna Morgan, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joice v. Rogers
as 6:2023cv00376
Petitioner: Brian Fredrick Joice
Respondent: Mike Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Castleman v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00919
Plaintiff: Mark Wayne Castleman
Defendant: Kevin Stitt, Steven Harpe, David Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tibbetts v. Rogers
as 5:2023cv00913
Petitioner: Kenneth H Tibbetts
Respondent: David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00912
Plaintiff: Anthony Lee Martin
Defendant: Department of Corrections, Steven Harpe, Mark Knutson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00323
Plaintiff: Roger D. Collins
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McGill v. Ballard et al
as 4:2023cv00365
Plaintiff: Samuel Curtis McGill, Jr
Defendant: Matt Ballard, George Gibbs, Jr., Mary Leavell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?