Cases 11 - 20 of 169
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Aundrea Culclager, Benny Magnus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
John Webb, Jr
Defendant:
Rory Griffin, Lonell Seamster and Jasmine Saih
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv01068
Plaintiff:
Robert Avery
Defendant:
Rory Griffin, Jessica Jackson Breedlove, Stringfellow Dentistry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Payne et al
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Michael L Boyd
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Rory Griffin, Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinder v. WellPath LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00138
Defendant:
WellPath LLC, Correct Care Solutions LLC, Gregory Reichgl and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Pinder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. McCain et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Calvin L Marshall
Defendant:
Kelly McCain, Tracy Bennett, Valerie Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Damien Ford
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Marshall Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges, III v. Vowell et al
as 6:2022cv06032
Plaintiff:
John David Bridges, III
Defendant:
DR. Nanette Vowell, DR. Thomas Daniel, Head Nurse Crystal McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herndon v. Daniel et al
as 6:2022cv06030
Plaintiff:
John Elwain Herndon
Defendant:
Dr. Thomas Daniel, Rory Griffin, DR. Nanette Vowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
