Cases 11 - 20 of 70
JENKINS et al v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2013cv05181
Plaintiff:
SHARON MARIE JENKINS
Defendant:
ROBERT DUFFY, ELAINE DUFFY, CONSTANCE PRINCIPAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JENKINS v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2013cv03490
Plaintiff:
SHARON MARIE JENKINS
Defendant:
ROBERT DUFFY, ELAINE DUFFY, CONSTANCE PRINCIPAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Royster v. Corizon et al
as 3:2013cv01449
Plaintiff:
Telly Royster
Defendant:
Corizon , Peter Binnion and Theodoor Voorstad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROYSTER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv45809
Plaintiff:
CLINTON B. ROYSTER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ROYSTER v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66318
Plaintiff:
SARA SMITH ROYSTER
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. , 3M BUSINESS PRODUCTS SALES, INC., PFIZER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROYSTER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv30951
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M ROYSTER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION and FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ROYSTER v. COMMONWEALTH
as 2:2011cv00477
Petitioner:
MICHEAL ROYSTER
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRCIT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF S. WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Royster v. Sniezek et al
as 1:2010cv02651
Plaintiff:
Tiffany L. Royster
Defendant:
T. R. Sniezek, Russell C. Hendershot, Eileen Falzini and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
