Cases filed in California
Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Martin J. Walsh v. Lifovum Fertility Management, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021mc00991
Respondent: Lifovum Fertility Management, LLC
Petitioner: Secretary of Labor martin j walsh
Defendant: Martin J. Walsh
Walsh v. Clawson Construction, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv02942
Plaintiff: Secretary of Labor and Martin J. Walsh
Defendant: CLAWSON CONSTUCTION CO., INC. 401(K) PLAN, Clawson Construction, Inc. and Clawson Construction Co., Inc. 401(K) Plan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Persian Broadcast Service Global Inc. v. Eugene Scalia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00229
Defendant: Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia, Majid Varess, U S Department of Labor and others
Plaintiff: Persian Broadcast Service Global Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Chamber of Commerce of the United State of America et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv07331
Plaintiff: University of Utah, Stanford University, Cornell University and others
Defendant: Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae: American Immigration Council, 46 Leading U.S. Companies, U.S. Tech Workers and others
Interested Party: Syed Nazim Ali and Colleges and Universities
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
R. Alexander Acosta v. Fernando Pinedo Garcia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv05230
Defendant: Fernando Pinedo d/b/a Healthy Harvesting, Fernando Pinedo Garcia and Fernando Pinedo Garcia doing business as Healthy Harvesting
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Type: Labor Labor: Other
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 3:2019cv01412
Defendant: Richard M. Clark, Administrative Law Judge, Bharath Raghukultilak, Loren Sweatt, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Health and Safety Administration and others
Plaintiff: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv06114
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association et al v. Chiang et al
as 2:2018at00977
Plaintiff: Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association , Jonathan M. Coupal and Debra A. Desrosiers
Defendant: John Chiang and The California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program
Intervenor_defendant: U.S. Secretary of Labor
Intervenor: U.S. Secretary of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Board of Trustees of the Apartment Employees Pension Fund et al v. R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor et al
as 3:2018cv02177
Petitioner: Board of Trustees of the Apartment Employees Pension Fund , Edward R. Lenhart, in his capacity as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust and Chuck Mack, individually and in his capacity as Co-Chairman/Secretary of the Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust
Respondent: R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor and Klaus Placke, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Director, United States Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Knutson v. Spearman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01725
Plaintiff: Ronald Knutson
Defendant: M.E. Spearman, Department of Army, Secretary of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?