Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv62338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451
Tito Vasquez v. Shell Gas Station et al
as 8:2020cv01005
Plaintiff:
Tito Vasquez
Defendant:
Shell Gas Station, Rawa and Sons, LLC and Shell Gas Station doing business as Shell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01801
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Espinosa v. Bonima Oil Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv25128
Plaintiff:
Gloria Patricia Nakamura Espinosa
Defendant:
Bonima Oil Corp., Ricardo Echeverria and Shell Gas Station
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. San Diego Outlet Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01882
Defendant:
Paras News LLC, Andys Smoke Shop, Inc., Eagle's Nest Property Management, LLC and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Roma Mikha, Inc., NMRM, Inc. and Skyline Market, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Outlaw Laboratory, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Edwards v. Shell Gas Station, et al
as 3:2017cv00976
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edwards
Defendant:
Shell Gas Station, Citgo, Kangaroo Express and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. Shells Gas Station et al
as 3:2017cv00984
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edwards
Defendant:
Shells Gas Station, Citgo, Kangaroo Express and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeffrey Vickers v. Craig Dong, et al
as 16-17630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT VICKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG E. DONG, CC 0215 Badge, WEST COBB DINER, PUBLIX and others
:
PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
