Cases 11 - 20 of 21
SHEPHERD v. SHULTZ
as 2:2017cv00190
Petitioner:
Erron Omar Shepherd
Respondent:
L. SHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grimes v. Shultz et al
as 3:2015cv00951
Plaintiff:
Jerome L Grimes
Defendant:
Christopher Shultz, Corey Arreola and Darrell Stripling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendoza-Hernandez v. Clayton et al
as 3:2015cv00592
Plaintiff:
Cesar Mendoza-Hernandez
Defendant:
NFN Clayton, NFN Shultz and NFN Ricotta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shultz v. Hercules Offshore, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
Syrelle W. Shultz
Defendant:
Hercules Offshore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Stier v. Perry et al
as 1:2013cv00412
Defendant:
Gregg Abbott, Austin Police Chief Art Acevedo, Shirley Arnold-Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Heather A. Stier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shultz v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01354
Plaintiff:
Michael Shultz
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stavinoha et al v. Satterfield and Pontikes Construction, Inc.
as 5:2011cv00826
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Garza, Cathy Haskell, Doris Orsak and others
Defendant:
Satterfield and Pontikes Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Freestone Resources, Inc. v. Shult et al
as 3:2010cv01349
Plaintiff:
Freestone Resources Inc
Defendant:
Lawrence Shultz, Environmental Services and Support Inc, David Feuerborn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Thomson et al
as 1:2010cv00050
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Gwen Cox, Dow Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
David Lightfoot Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
