Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Marignay v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv05013
Plaintiff:
Jaymon Marignay
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Clayton County Jail, Clayton County Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tetro LTD. v. Smart Trike MNF. PTE. LTD. et al
as 1:2022cv04938
Plaintiff:
Tetro LTD.
Defendant:
Smart Trike MNF. PTE. LTD., Smartrike Marketing, LTD and Smartrike USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Murry v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv04341
Plaintiff:
James Willie Murry
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Clayton County Jail Administration, Officer Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murry v. Hill et al
as 4:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
James Willie Murry
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Clayton County Jail Administration, Officer Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Person v. Victor Hill, Clayton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2022cv02572
Plaintiff:
Edward Jamar Person
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor Hill, Administration, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Laidler v. Sharp et al
as 6:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Laidler
Defendant:
Ms. FNU Sharp, Lt. FNU Shoemaker, Sgt. FNU Fugitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. Superior Court of Fulton County et al
as 1:2021cv01723
Defendant:
Paul L. Howard, Officer K. Smart, Atlanta Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Tiye Muhammed and Sharron Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
