Cases 11 - 20 of 2,628
Fantel v. Handley et al
as 3:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Jeremy Handley, Stacey O'Neil, Joseph H. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. Target Contactors LLC
as 5:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
James Arnold, Sr.
Defendant:
Target Contactors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
James v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00489
Petitioner:
Alphonso James, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. Jordan et al
as 8:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Jordan, Chad Chronister, Doctor Ogga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. State of Florida et al (Lee County)
as 2:2024cv00382
Petitioner:
Kendrick Tyron Perry, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Florida and Joshua Roos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Le Clerc v. Waters et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff T.K. Waters, M. Clark, W. Thomas, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUJICA v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
KERVIN MORENO MUJICA, SR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and LAURA ANNE ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALE v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
RODRICK HALE
Defendant:
RENEE HALE, TERRENCE HALE, TERRY MITHELL, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGrath v. Rice-Tanner et al
as 8:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee McGrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Alex W Rice-Tanner and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McGrath v. Rice-Tanner et al
as 8:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee McGrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Alex W Rice-Tanner and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
