Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al v. Cameron Parish
as 2:2022cv05280
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London subscribing to Policy No AMR-41923-05, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, Q B E Specialty Insurance Co and others
Defendant:
School Board of Cameron Parish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
School Board of Cameron Parish v. Indian Harbor Insurance Co et al
as 2:2022cv05283
Plaintiff:
Cameron Parish School Board and School Board of Cameron Parish
Defendant:
Indian Harbor Insurance Co, Q B E Specialty Insurance Co, Steadfast Insurance Co and others
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Janice v. Steadfast Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv04054
Plaintiff:
Jerome Janice
Defendant:
Steadfast Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zagis USA L L C v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al
as 2:2022cv02189
Plaintiff:
Zagis USA, LLC and Zagis U S A L L C
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
J M K 5 Texas City L L C et al v. AmRisc L P et al
as 5:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
JMK5 Texas City LLC, JMK5 Shreveport LLC, J M K 5 Texas City L L C and others
Defendant:
AmRisc L L C, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, HDI Global Specialty SE and others
Counter Claimant:
General Security Indemnity Co of Arizona, H D I Global Specialty S E and Gneral Security Indemnity Co of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Vintage Realty Co L L C et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London severally subscribing to Certificate No AMR-59283-03
as 2:2021cv04301
Plaintiff:
Vintage Realty Co, Nelson Pointe Apartment Homes, LLC, Vintage Realty Co L L C and others
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Vintage Realty Co L L C et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Severally Subscribing to Certificate No AMR-59283-03 et al
as 2:2021cv04300
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Vintage Realty Co L L C and Country Club Pointe L L C
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Severally Subscribing to Certificate No AMR-59283-03, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, Q B E Specialty Insurance Co and others
Counter Claimant:
General Security Indemnity Co of Arizona, United Specialty Insurance Co, Safety Specialty Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Vintage Realty Co et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London et al
as 1:2021cv04300
Plaintiff:
Vintage Realty Co and Nelson Pointe Apartment Homes, LLC
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Vintage Realty Co L L C et al v. Certain Underwriters Lloyds London et al
as 1:2021cv04298
Plaintiff:
Vintage Realty Co, Magnolia Trace Apartment Homes, LLC, Vintage Realty Co L L C and others
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Londoin Subscribing to Policy No AMR-63188-02 et al v. Bufkin Enterprises L L C
as 2:2021cv04069
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, Londoin Subscribing to Policy No. AMR-63188-02, Lexington Insurance Company, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Bufkin Enterprises, LLC and Bufkin Enterprises L L C
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
