Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Ward v. Morgan
as 7:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Norell Sterling Ward and Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Ms. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Ward v. McCall et al
as 7:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward and Norell
Defendant:
Matthew McCall, Mark Jones, Mark B. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Martin et al
as 7:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Anthony D. Martin and Brian Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Martin et al
as 1:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Anthony D. Martin and Brian Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. McCall et al
as 1:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward and Norell
Defendant:
Matthew McCall, Mark Jones, Mark B. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Seely et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Ms. Seely and Ms. Cabell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. McDonald et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Lennard, Econshew and Neparos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. McDonald et al
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Mr. McDonald and Ms. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Sterling-BM, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Timothy Woods
Defendant:
Sterling-BM, LLC doing business as Lithia Motors, Inc. doing business as Sterling Motorcars doing business as Sterling BMW/Mini, Tony Moorehead and Matthew Bibbo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
