Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Davis v. Supreme Court of Texas
as 4:2015cv00082
Petitioner:
Chelsea L Davis
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Texas
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Osborne et al v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2013cv00528
Defendant:
Board of Law Examiners, Buck Files, State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Jamar Osborne and Mikal Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Senior v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00298
Plaintiff:
Warren R Senior, Jr
Defendant:
The State of Texas, The Texas Supreme Court of Texas, The Court of Appeals First District of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Amrhein v. La Madeleine Inc et al
as 3:2011cv02440
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Amrhein
Defendant:
La Madeleine Inc , State of Texas , Rick Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amrhein v. La Madeleine Inc et al
as 4:2011cv00364
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Amrhein
Defendant:
La Madeleine Inc , State of Texas , Rick Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonham v. Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas
as 1:2009cv00541
Plaintiff:
James Walter Bonham
Defendant:
Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montenegro v. The 108th Judicial District Court et al
as 2:2008cv00223
Plaintiff:
Roberto Rubio Montenegro
Defendant:
The 108th Judicial District Court, The Seventh Court of Appeals, The Court of Criminal Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Certified Civil Process Servers Association of Texas et al v. The Supreme Court of Texas et al
as 1:2008cv00665
Plaintiff:
The Certified Civil Process Servers Association of Texas, The Certified Civil Process Servers Association of Texas, Tod Pendergrass and others
Defendant:
The Supreme Court of Texas, Wallace B. Jefferson, Nathan Hecht and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
