Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Davis v. Safe Streets USA LLC, et al
as 5:2019cv00455
Defendant:
Safe Streets USA LLC and Always Protected Security, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lauren Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fitzhenry v. ADT LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00394
Petitioner:
Mark Fitzhenry
Respondent:
ADT LLC, Tektiks Innovative Network USA, Inc. and Safe Streets USA LLC
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones and Stewart Abramson
Defendant:
Acquity LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fitzhenry v. ADT LLC et al ***Do not docket in this case. See case #5:19-cv-394-BO**
as 7:2019cv00174
Petitioner:
Mark Fitzhenry
Respondent:
ADT LLC, Tektiks Innovative Network USA, Inc. and Safe Streets USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fitzhenry v. ADT LLC et al
as 9:2019cv80626
Defendant:
ADT LLC and Safe Streets USA LLC
Plaintiff:
Mark Fitzhenry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watkins v. ADT, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00424
Plaintiff:
Cierra Watkins
Defendant:
ADT, LLC and Safe Streets USA, LLC
Johnson et al v. ADT, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00292
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, ADT, LLC, The ADT Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Timothy Collins v. Safe Streets USA LLC, et al
as 2:2017cv03760
Plaintiff:
Timothy Collins
Defendant:
Does and Safe Streets USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
ADT LLC et al v. CTS PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC. et al
as 9:2014cv81548
Plaintiff:
ADT LLC and SAFE STREETS USA, LLC
Defendant:
CTS PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC. , CHRIS SULLIVAN and TERI SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Landers v. Safe Streets USA LLC
as 5:2011cv00749
Plaintiff:
Dwain Landers
Defendant:
Safe Streets USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
